Cohort. Candidate. Fusion inhibitors. Placebo. Double blind. HPTN
035. Randomization. Surfactant. “Wait a minute! Sounds like some
words coming out of a science fiction movie.

But this is not about science fiction or even a movie. It was the
2008 Microbicides Conference held in New Delhi, India and these were definitely the major language spoken at the conference .You are sure to hear them at any of the sessions for which you had to sit in. Navigating through the microbicides conference was indeed an
interesting process. It’s even a challenging process especially for
someone like us who must capture most of the crucial moments and
report all the track A, B and C sessions to a mixed audience of
journalists, PLWH, scientists and even other lay men. Was it
difficult?

Well, to some extent, yes. But when you try to catch up and seems
this researcher or principal investigator (PI) is beginning to speak
in tongues again, you simply switch off, fiddle with your blackberry
and send an sms or email, or take your leave. Some delegates are
even inconsiderate -they just sleep and snore on loudly and care
less what is being presented.

And as soon the speaker is done…they join every one in the usual
round of applaud that greets each presentation no matter
how “senseless” or “boring” it must have been.

While it is right to state that there are some people who had no
business being at the microbicides conference, some of the speakers especially scientist needed to be schooled in the art of
communication. Specifically, the task here is how
to “communicate”(not present) study findings to a mixed audience.

Well Drs. Sharon Hiller and John Mellors actually stood out among
the crowd here. They communicated during their presentations. They
simply spoke in “is and was; A, B and C”. Dr. Hillier’s presentation
on the Tenofovir study by the Microbicides Trial Network (MTN) and
Dr. Mellor’s role play illustrating the science of ARV treatment and
drug resistance was a classic.

I don’t know if it’s a Pittsburgh tradition (since they are both
from Pittsburgh) but they gave more sense to Judge Edwin Cameron’s postulations at M2006 in Cape Town that “Science is useless if it has no social relevance”. One can take that further to say that research is useless if it can’t be simply communicated to those who would benefit from it.

The microbicides conference is fast becoming a prestigious
conference that enjoys global following and efforts should be made
to attract advocates and supporters who can really discuss the
issues with a lay audience. Understanding the language is therefore
a major step in this direction Just in case one is forced to think that the microbicides conference is not an avenue for laymen to acquire research education, even some doctors I spoke with who were attending the conference for the first time heard Greek and Russian during some of the sessions. Well…for those who believe in self-development and really want to make progress as advocates or communicators who must educate people as we hope for a breakthrough in microbicices research development efforts, here is a glossary of terms used in microbicides research graciously developed by Gender AIDS Forum, South Africa.
www.gaf.org.za