I had been asked several times when I write manuscripts to explain the term – community engagement. I kept wondering why as I had assumed that community engagement was a universally understood terminology. Finally I get it. I am at a symposium titled: community engagement, communications and technology in Ebola clinical trials; that took place in Dakar and organised by a well funded group. The term community engagement was used several  times during this meeting and I finally get it.
Two things became clear to me. The first is that often, community engagement is used to describe an activity – getting community members informed about whatever it is they want to know. For me however, I had always discussed community engagement as a programme consisting of multiple sets of identified activities, governed by sets of principles. Sharing of information is one of the many activities but it is not all. It is a programme that can be monitored and evaluated for its success and impact. Check out the Good Participatory Practice guidelines developed by UNAIDS and WHO and you get a sense of what I am talking about. Something close to the GCP and GLP guidelines.
Second, that community engagement is an activity that helps to get community on board an agenda – research or programme. For me community engagement is a programme designed to empower communities to be able to make informed decisions about engaging with an agenda – research or programme. These are two different objectives. And so when an institution or organisation with vested interest conduct community engagement – what they end up doing is the activity not a programme.
Hummmm – the HIV prevention research world has a lot to bring to the global health research table I think. Hummmm.